Germany wants euro-area finance chiefs to avoid splitting consideration of a 130 billion-euro ($171 billion) Greek rescue and a bond swap to cut the nation’s debt load at a meeting next week, coalition lawmakers were told by German government officials in a briefing.
As long as Greece meets conditions for the aid, the finance chiefs will probably approve the package along with the debt exchange, three German officials involved in the telephone briefing yesterday said. A Finance Ministry spokesman declined to comment.
Wrangling among euro-area finance ministers on a Feb. 15 conference call over how to reduce Greece’s debt load and tighten control of the aid raised the prospect of a two-step process, according to two people familiar with the talks. In that scenario, the ministers’ Feb. 20 gathering in Brussels would be limited to kicking off the bond exchange and deferring decision on the rest of the bailout funds.
As recriminations fly between Greece and its northern European creditors, the clock is ticking toward a March 20 bond redemption when Greece must pay 14.5 billion euros or trigger the first sovereign default in the euro’s 13-year history.
“We expect the Greeks to rise to their responsibilities,” German Deputy Finance Minister Steffen Kampeter told a group of lawyers in Hamburg yesterday. “This coming Monday, we will see whether Greece delivers or whether we will be forced to decide on another course of action, one that is not desired.”
Euro Gains
Investors sent the euro and global stocks higher as they anticipated the culmination of the seven-month effort to complete a second bailout for Greece. The currency rose for the first time in five days, gaining 0.7 percent to $1.3153 at 11 p.m. in Athens.
While Greek lawmakers this month passed austerity measures that were required for the aid, the euro ministers wrestled with the latest setback, hearing on their call that Greece would miss debt-reduction goals. Without further measures to close the funding gap, Greece’s debt would fall to 129 percent of gross domestic product in 2020, missing a target of 120 percent, said three people familiar with the talks who declined to be named because they are still in progress. Last year, the level was about 160 percent.
European authorities are discussing charging it lower rates, the three officials said. Greece obtained its first, 110 billion-euro loan package in May 2010 at rates averaging 5 percent. Euro governments have already cut that figure once, to about 4 percent in March 2011.
ECB Holdings
Central bankers have also indicated that the ECB could funnel future profits from its Greek bond holdings to national governments and on into the crisis program. They have agreed that they “don’t wish to make a profit on Greece,” ECB Governing Council member Luc Coene of Belgiumsaid this week. An ECB spokesman declined to comment.
More controversial is a proposal for national central banks to take part in the private exchange by accepting losses on Greek bonds in their investment portfolios. France is virtually alone in backing that idea, one of the officials said.
The ECB is swapping its Greek bonds for new ones to ensure it isn’t forced to take losses in a debt restructuring, three euro-area officials said.
The multiple scenarios led to a possible two-step decision -- authorizing the bond exchange next week and then completing the 130 billion-euro public aid program -- that would raise political risks by requiring two votes in some national parliaments.
Summit Showdown
Iran Unlikely to Strike First, U.S. Official Says
The Iranian military is unlikely to intentionally provoke a conflict with the West, the top U.S. military intelligence official said today.
Lieutenant General Ronald Burgess, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said Iran probably has the ability to “temporarily close the Strait of Hormuz with its naval forces,” as some Iranian officials have threatened to do if attacked or in response to sanctions on its oil exports by the U.S. and European Union.
“Iran has also threatened to launch missiles against the United Statesand our allies in the region in response to an attack,” Burgess said in testimony at a hearing today of the Senate Armed Services Committee. “It could also employ its terrorist surrogates worldwide. However, it is unlikely to initiate or intentionally provoke a conflict or launch a preemptive attack.”
Iran has the capability to strike regional and European targets with its ballistic missiles and is seeking to improve their accuracy, Burgess said in the latest U.S. public assessment of Iran’s military prowess. Iran’s regional military capability continues to improve, with new ships and submarines and expanded bases in the Gulf of Oman, Persian Gulf and Caspian Sea, he said.
No Israeli Decision
U.S. interests are threatened by Iran through its support of terrorist and militant groups, as shown in “the recent plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States,” Burgess said. Burgess said Israel hasn’t made a decision to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Iran’s Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimi said on Dec. 27 that his nation may close the Strait of Hormuz, the passageway for about one-fifth of globally traded oil, if the U.S. and its allies impose stricter economic sanctions in an effort to halt his country’s nuclear research. U.S. officials such as Pentagon spokesman George Little have said since that threat that they haven’t seen any Iranian moves to close the waterway.
Burgess testified about the annual assessment of global threats by U.S. civilian and military intelligence agencies. Turning to the war in Afghanistan, Burgess told the committee that the country’s national army and police face continued challenges in developing “into an independent, self-sustaining security apparatus.”
12 comments:
OT-I read where healthcare 'from a distance' may be the new thing (FT Times). I am seeing this as the VA just sent hubby an 'invitation' to sign up to see a video featuring the latest 'doctor over the internet'.
This might make me comfortable had I not just watched Dr. Who and the Cybermen. Or had I not seen Star Trek and the Borg.
I think Germany is in danger of creating bitterness that will fester. People who have been wronged or do well are often blamed and become 'enemies' of the others who feel they have been wronged.
As for the US interests and Iran...I would hate to see Israel trapped by Iran (which I think may be happening.) Iran YEARNS for the Israelis to do something stupid. Then again, reading the UK Telegraph article where a former UN Inspector wrote about his inspections in Iran made me shudder. Do you believe what they SAY or what they DO? Who runs Iran? A cooler head? A religious head? A political head? That entire situation is a 'roll the dice' IMO. One shot fired like Archduke Ferdinand and....?
Still, there is something about a group of people who want to annihilate others simply because they exist that bothers me. It bothers me because it has been done before with blacks, Jews, Christians, Muslims, etc. and we never seem to learn this lesson from past history.
Each of us has to decide how/what/if we could kill. Such decisions should not be taken lightly and often force us to look at the darker side of our nature. Perhaps that is why I enjoy Dr. Who so much ;-) He always gives the bad guys a warning. ONE. And lots of times his punishments always 'fit' what the villains truly want which only shows be careful what you wish for ;-)
It is a fine line to walk not as Chamberlain did but not 'feed' into a sentiment (no matter how right it may be) to go to war quickly. Governments often use religion to 'rally' wars which brings up an interesting scenario to ponder...like if we all follow humanism, does humanism then become a religion?
I happen to believe science and religion can coexist. The problem is that I also believe that there are some things we are better off not knowing. Unlike Pandora or the recent glut of shows on psychics, I'm quite happy NOT knowing the future. I have enough problems right here in the present, thank you very much.
So while I believe it is good to buy gold to protect yourself, I'm never going to be one who will put all my eggs in one basket as many an 'expert' is left with nothing but an omelet.
Enjoy your weekend...
Anyone who believes such discussions or stands come easy has probably allowed others to influence them. I believe that such sentiments and decisions come only after nights of searching and days of agonizing. Forgiveness is a word easily spelled but not easily practiced...and something which I struggle with daily...
here are the links for back pain related websites:
http://www.bigbackpain.com/back_exercises.html
http://www.losethebackpain.com/backpainexercises.html
I found most of these from a Google search for "back pain exercises" lots of great links and YouTube videos etc
http://www.spine-health.com/
Search for "back pain" lots of links and info here:
https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/health/care/consumer/health-wellness/conditions-diseases/health-encyclopedia
Use of the magic pillow trick is the first thing you should do, for immediate pain relief, so you can get to the point where you can start doing the exercises.
Only do the ones they recommend, other "normal" exercises and fitness equipment are no good for people with back problems, and can do more damage.
chicken little - well said.
Religion has been the cause for more wars and deaths than just about any other reason through history.
"Fundamentalists" of all types are very dangerous, as they are totally blinded by how "righteous" they are and how wrong the "others" are.
Personally, I favor the banning of all religions, but that is not going to happen. So all we can do is ignore the strident "fundamentalists" who try to impose their viewpoints on others.
To that end, neither Iran nor Israel are worth any of our support, as they are both driven by their religious ideologies to do things which are simply not right or morally correct, whatever their religious and political leaders have to say.
If you examine the statements of both sides, they are equally irrational and hatred filled, in their own ways. I can't summon any support for either.
GAW,
Great stuff. have you got a similar link for how to make $1000 a day daytrading?
Mugabe too funny. GAW thank you for the exercises and I am in the same boat with you about religion. It's ok to have all your eggs in one basket as long as it is the right one. ;-)
I think the bankers and the Fed use some sort of alien math to have kept this charade going as long as it has. I am sure complicity by the governing agencies such as the SEC allow them to steal with no consequences. Done long enough, what will be left to steal?
Here is a question if you had to put all your wealth in cash, stocks bonds or PMS which one allows you to sleep better at night.
Now granted most of us are diversified to some extent, but the hypothetical question is if you had to make one choice, would you be sleep better knowing your money is in stocks, bonds, cash or PMs and why?
my dad used to say if the government failed, nothing would be worth anything. I've read about the Greeks who are using safety deposit boxes to hide their cash. Stocks are basically investments in others. Precious metals make a nice 'clink' sound ;-)
If all money is basically an exchange for barter then I would have to go for PMs as no matter how much they are worth they should have some value for exchange.
That said, I think I'd take a page out of your book and also go for popular 'exchange' items...seeds, alcohol, chocolate, etc.
Well, my house is clean (finally). My 'kids' come home tonight. We're having dinner out with friends. We may get some snow on Sun. night. Glad my kids will get in before that hits ;-)
CL I agree staple foodstuff and especially alcohol and cigarettes would be good barter. Make sure they are things that won't go bad, Canned good and Kitty puts things up in jars. A skill I have yet to develop. Gold never goes to zero, but cash does since it is only paper and ink. Since there is little faith in our government it will be worth the same.
qb,
To answer your question, you need to know which cash.
On a theoretical level, if I had to put all my money in one place and forget about, it would probably be in real estate in an absolutely prime location in a stable country. For example, a flat in a select area of Zurich seems like a pretty safe investment as you'd always have rental income
I think that is a great idea Mugabe.
What would a flat in Zurich run? I tried to look into immigration to Switzerland and you have to be related to get in.
No idea, probably a fortune! Not even sure a foreigner could buy. It was a theoreticval answer! For Zurich read Paris, London, Amsterdam, New York, Stockhlom, etc. Mind you, like everything, gold definitely included, if you buy at the wrong time you could have a decade of nil capital appreciation, but at least you'd have the rent.
Post a Comment