Wednesday, March 31, 2010

1st Quarter End Video Market Review from Alpha Trends





Brian Shannon is a full time trader (with 17 years of experience), educator and author of the highly regarded book Technical Analysis Using Multiple...More »

Bonus Video 
This was on C-Span 4/19/2009, but since nothing has changed in regards to financial reform, the interview could just as well have been done yesterday. I give you a one hour interview with Janet Tavakoli courtesy of C-Span. QB



Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Andrew Maguire & Adrian Douglas: Discuss What Could Be the Largest Fraud in History


I think this may be an important story if true and may not just be a couple of conspiracy nuts. It is about a 30 minute interview and I am very interested in your opinions. QB

http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/3/30_Andrew_Maguire_%26_Adrian_Douglass.html
Andrew is an independent metals trader turned whistleblower at the center of a storm for exposing what could be the largest fraud in history involving countries, banks and government leaders. Adrian Douglas Board of Director from GATA, the man who Andrew reached out to joins in this interview where they discuss a fraud so extraordinary and so unimaginable that it is the kind of thing that only happens in hollywood thrillers. They also discuss the CFTC sponsored meeting on metals which was an unmitigated disaster because it additionally exposed the fraud on a grander scale.  

Rio turns to Kissinger for help


Thank you Shaza.
He is a controversial figure who has won the Nobel peace prize and been accused of being a war criminal. But a former US secretary of state, Henry Kissinger, is the man Rio Tinto has turned to help rebuild its bridges with China following the failed Chinalco deal and the jailing of four executives, including Stern Hu.
Dr Kissinger, 87, is well known in China since his secret 1971 meeting with Premier Zhou Enlai paved the path for the US president Richard Nixon's historic meeting with Mao Zedong.
The Herald understands Dr Kissinger helped secure a meeting on Rio's behalf with Wang Qishan, a Politburo member and former banker who handles many of China's international financial affairs.
Hu's lawyer, Shi Keqiang, told the Herald he had not talked with his client since Hu was sentenced to 10 years' jail on Monday for receiving bribes and obtaining commercial secrets. Hu, who was sacked by Rio Tinto shortly after the sentencing, has 10 days to lodge an appeal.
The sentencing sparked a war of words, with the Chinese government expressing ''serious concern'' over Australian criticism of Hu's trial. The comment came after the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, said he had reservations about the conviction and the secrecy of the Chinese court.
''China, I believe, has missed an opportunity to demonstrate to the world at large transparency that would be consistent with its emerging global role,'' Mr Rudd said. The Australian government condemned bribery, he said, but trials of this nature should be held publicly and ''with full representation from diplomatic missions''.
The Foreign Minister, Stephen Smith, said the resulting uncertainty over what constitutes a commercial secret would have repercussions for the international business community's dealings with China.
''The Australian side should respect that result and stop making such irresponsible remarks,'' the Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, Qin Gang, hit back.
Yesterday the opposition accused the government of moving too slowly and not protesting strongly enough when diplomats were told they would not have access to the full trial, despite a consular agreement.
''Kevin Rudd has been exposed as having little or no influence with the Chinese leadership,'' Julie Bishop, the foreign affairs spokeswoman for the opposition, said.
The impact of the case would be felt not only by Australia's resource sector, but finance, IT companies and across the commercial world, she said.
Ms Bishop said ''there is nothing'' in Australia's consular agreement that stated it was overridden by domestic Chinese law, and the federal government had accepted it simply because the Chinese said so.
Mr Rudd said the government had made ''strong, high-level and frequent representations'' on Hu's behalf.
He said Australia had had disagreements with Beijing before and the relationship would ''sustain these sorts of pressures''.

THE SENTENCE

Was Stern Hu's sentence harsh by Australian standards?
A federal government official found guilty of taking a bribe in Australia can be jailed for 10 years.
Anyone taking a bribe in NSW can get up to seven years' jail.
''So, in one sense, the Chinese bribery law penalties are not outlandish - but this was, even if you accept the prosecution evidence, a first offence,'' said a barrister, Greg Barns, a director of the Australian Lawyers Alliance.
''And in this case it was not bribery involving a government official. So it is harsh in Australian terms.''

Gold and Commodities China and AUS

Sunday, March 28, 2010
THE GAME PLAN
http://goldscents.blogspot.com/2010/03/game-plan.html

From the Pragmatic Capitalist.
WHERE ARE THE COMMODITY MARKETS HEADED?
http://pragcap.com/where-are-the-commodity-markets-headed

And a little something about AUS/China
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/us-china-australia-love-triangle

Monday, March 29, 2010

Why Billionaire Says He’s Only NBA Owner Who Can Dunk


By Stephanie Baker
March 29 (Bloomberg) -- Mikhail Prokhorov steps off his Gulfstream V into the swirling snow and subzero temperatures of Krasnoyarsk, Siberia, where he’s come to visit his gold mine. Though it’s almost midnight, Prokhorov has no interest in retiring to his hotel room. Instead, he’s whisked away in a police-escorted Mercedes to the local gym, where he puts in two hours running on a treadmill and lifting weights, Bloomberg Markets reports in its May issue.
Even in the depths of Siberia, Prokhorov’s mind wanders thousands of miles away to Brooklyn, New York, where he plans to install his new trophy asset: the New Jersey Nets basketball team. Prokhorov, Russia’s second-richest man, according to Moscow’s Finans magazine, was little known in the U.S. until last year, when he agreed to pay $200 million for an 80 percent stake in the Nets and a 45 percent share in their new Brooklyn arena. He’s not bothered that the Nets were one of the worst teams in the history of professional basketball in the 2010 season, with a record of 8-63 on March 25.
“There is only one way to go: up,” says Prokhorov, 44, in the Krasnoyarsk gym, as he bench-presses 50 kilograms (110 pounds) in baggy sweatpants and a gray Nets T-shirt. “I like to find cheap assets with problems. It gives me power.”
Prokhorov, who’s more than 2 meters (6 feet 7 inches) tall, stands out among Russian billionaires for more than just his height. While other moguls gorged on debt in acquisitive binges that left them on the brink of state takeovers, Prokhorov feasted on their remains, growing richer by investing in gold and aluminum even as the Russian economy shrank 8 percent in 2009.
‘Musical Chairs’
“Prokhorov was in a game of musical chairs, and when the music stopped, he was sitting down,” says Christopher Granville, managing editor of London-based Trusted Sources UK Ltd., an emerging-markets research firm.
Armed with cash, Prokhorov is now expanding beyond his gold and metals holdings into areas such as debt restructuring and hybrid cars and is looking for partners outside Russia for new investments.
The U.S., which so far has been relatively untouched by Russia’s new class of billionaires, is an important part of Prokhorov’s global strategy. And the Nets purchase is about more than basketball.
“It’s about opening up other business opportunities in the U.S.,” Prokhorov says, sipping tea at 2 a.m. at his hotel in Krasnoyarsk. “If I want to do something else, people won’t say, ‘Who’s that?’ They’ll say, ‘That’s the owner of the Nets.’'
For the entire story follow this link:

TDI Podcast 154: John Mauldin – What Do We Tell Our Kids?

March 28, 2010

Guest: John Mauldin and Andrew discuss the future of the U.S. economy and the legacy that we are leaving our children. Also, we have a few rants on Greece and the Euro as well as a look at the “Stochastics Up” screen from 3/12. To finish off, we have a call-in from a listener and answer the important question regarding currencies.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

A SNEAK PEEK INTO THE WEEK AHEAD From Alphatrends and Stockcharts.com

Brian Shannon is a full time trader (with 17 years of experience), educator and author of the highly regarded book Technical Analysis Using Multiple...More »



This one is from Shaza for Monday trading. You'll have to click on both of them to make it large enough to see.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Will Hunting interviews with the NSA. Queenbee



Good Will Hunting Harvard Bar Scene is just as funny.QB

Bond Market Verdict: U.S. Treasuries Riskier Than Toilet Paper!

Courtesy of Shaza
By Mike Larson on March 27, 2010 | More Posts By Mike Larson | Author's Website
For the whole article follow the link:
http://www.dailymarkets.com/stocks/2010/03/26/bond-market-verdict-us-treasuries-riskier-than-toilet-paper/

I have a lot of respect for Warren Buffett. As Nilus has noted before, he’s one of the world’s best long-term investors. He has a knack for buying low and selling high. And his Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A: 121988.00 -662.00 -0.54%) holding company has been a great multi-year performer for investors.
It has amassed stakes in everything from the Geico insurance firm to the manufactured home company Clayton Homes to the Dairy Queen restaurant chain.
But Buffett can’t levy taxes on Americans. He can’t wage war in far corners of the world. He isn’t responsible for your Social Security checks. He doesn’t operate the National Park System or make sure the drugs we take are safe. That’s the job of the federal government.
And yet, a remarkable thing occurred recently in the bond market …
Berkshire’s cost of borrowing fell BELOW Uncle Sam’s! Ditto for Procter & Gamble(PG: 63.69 +0.07 +0.11%), the company behind brands like Tide detergent and Charmin toilet paper … Lowe’s, the home improvement retailer … and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ: 64.38 -0.19 -0.29%), the firm that makes Band-Aids, medical devices, and baby shampoo, according to Bloomberg.
Bottom line: Bond investors are now viewing Treasuries as riskier than a vast array of corporate debt. They’d rather own bonds backed by sales of toilet paper than the full faith and credit of the United States. If that’s not a sign of how low we’ve sunk, I don’t know what is!

Friday, March 26, 2010

JPMorgan, Lehman, UBS Named in Bid-Rigging Conspiracy

OMG say it ain't so Joe! The banksters were at it again? Imagine that. They steal in broad daylight and when called on the carpet, they get a slap on the wrist, pay a few million in legal fees to the legal firm that they probably own and no one goes to jail. Where is justice? Well we already know that justice is blind!
By William Selway and Martin Z. Braun




March 26 (Bloomberg) -- JPMorgan Chase & Co.Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.and UBS AG were among more than a dozen Wall Street firms involved in a conspiracy to pay below-market interest rates to U.S. state and local governments on investments, according to documents filed in a U.S. Justice Department criminal antitrust case.
A government list of previously unidentified “co- conspirators” contains more than two dozen bankers at firms also including Bank of America Corp.,Bear Stearns Cos.Societe Generale, two of General Electric Co.’s financial businesses and Salomon Smith Barney, the former unit of Citigroup Inc., according to documents filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on March 24.
The papers were filed by attorneys for a former employee of CDR Financial Products Inc., an advisory firm indicted in October. The attorneys, as part of their legal filing, identified the roster as being provided by the government. The document is labeled “list of co-conspirators.”
None of the firms or individuals named on the list has been charged with wrongdoing. The court records mark the first time these companies have been identified as co-conspirators. They provide the broadest look yet at alleged collusion in the $2.8 trillion municipal securities market that the government says delivered profits to Wall Street at taxpayers’ expense.
‘Sufficient Evidence’
“If the government is saying they are co-conspirators, the government believes they have sufficient evidence that they can show they were part of the conspiracy,” said Richard Donovan, a partner at New York-based law firmKelley Drye & Warren LLP and co-chair of its antitrust practice. Donovan isn’t involved in the case.
The government’s case centers on investments known as guaranteed investment contracts that cities, states and school districts buy with the money they receive through municipal bond sales. Some $400 billion of municipal bonds are issued each year, and localities use the contracts to earn a return on some of the money until they need it for construction or other projects.
The Internal Revenue Service sometimes collects earnings on those investments and requires that they be awarded by competitive bidding to ensure that governments receive a fair return. The government charges that CDR ran sham auctions that allowed the banks to pay below-market interest rates to local governments.
CDR Fights Case
CDR, a Los Angeles-based local-government adviser, was indicted in October along with David Rubin, Zevi Wolmark and Evan Zarefsky, three current or former executives. The company and the three men have denied wrongdoing. Since last month, three former CDR employees who weren’t charged in the initial indictment have pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with the Justice Department.
More than a dozen financial firms are also facing civil suits filed by municipalities over the alleged conspiracy. Yesterday, U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero in Manhattan refused to toss out a lawsuit brought by Mississippi and other bond issuers.
Brian Marchiony, a spokesman for JPMorgan in New York; Doug Morris, a spokesman for UBS in New York; and Danielle Romero- Apsilos, a spokeswoman for Citigroup in New York, all declined to comment. A Societe Generale spokesman, Jim Galvin; Lehman spokeswoman Kimberly MacLeod, and GE Capital spokesman Ned Reynolds in Stamford, Connecticut, also declined to comment. Bank of America spokeswoman Shirley Norton in San Francisco declined to comment. Bear Stearns was bought by JPMorgan in 2008, the same year Lehman Brothers collapsed.
‘Absolute Disaster’
Laura Sweeney, a Justice Department spokeswoman in Washington, declined to comment.
Banks may choose to cooperate with prosecutors because in light of the government bailout funds they’ve received “a guilty plea would just be an absolute disaster for some of these companies,” said Nathan Muyskens, a partner at Shook, Hardy & Bacon in Washington and former trial attorney with the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Competition.
“There have been antitrust investigations where there have been companies involved that were just never indicted,” he said in a phone interview.
At the same time, the government will probably focus on seeking to convict individual bankers, he said.
“When someone goes to jail for five years, that resonates,” he said. “When a company pays $200 million, it’s simply a balance sheet issue. Jail time is what captures corporate America’s attention.”
Lawyers’ Filing
In a court filing yesterday, defense lawyers said they “inadvertently” included the names of individual and company co-conspirators in a motion asking the court to compel the government to provide more specific evidence of the alleged misconduct. They asked the court to strike the entire exhibit in which the list appears. Judge Marrero granted the request.
The government’s probe became public in 2006 when federal investigators raided CDR and two competitors and issued subpoenas to more than a dozen firms. The “co-conspirators” on the list released in court this week also included Wachovia Corp., which was purchased by San Francisco-based Wells Fargo & Co. in 2008. Elise Wilkinson, a Wells Fargo spokeswoman in Charlotte, North Carolina, didn’t return a call today seeking comment.
October Indictments
The indictments released in October didn’t identify any of the sellers of the investment contracts involved in the alleged conspiracy. They were identified only as Provider A and Provider B. They paid kickbacks to CDR after winning investment deals brokered by the firm, according to the indictments.
The firms did this by paying sham fees tied to financial transactions entered into with other companies, prosecutors said. Kickbacks were paid from 2001 to 2005, ranging from $4,500 to $475,000 each, according to the Justice Department.
According to the list contained in the court filing this week, the investment contracts involved were created by units of GE and divisions of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd., a bond insurer formerly part of Brussels-based lender Dexia SA.
The kickbacks were paid out of fees generated by transactions entered into with two financial institutions that weren’t identified in the October court filing. The March 24 list filed by the defense named the two firms as UBS and Royal Bank of Canada.
Dexia Sale
Dexia completed the sale of FSA’s bond-insurance business in July to Assured Guaranty Ltd. of Hamilton, Bermuda, while retaining its outstanding investment contracts.
Thierry Martiny, a spokesman for Dexia in Brussels, declined to comment. FSA, based in New York, was the biggest insurer of U.S. municipal bonds in 2007 and 2008.
“We have no comment,” said Betsy Castenir, a spokeswoman for Assured Guaranty in New York, in an e-mail response. “Dexia has responsibility for the liabilities of the Financial Products business.”
Royal Bank of Canada “has been fully cooperating with the government,”Kevin Foster, a spokesman for the bank in New York, said in an e-mailed statement. “We have no knowledge or evidence of wrongdoing by any of our employees.”

Silver Thursday Plus 30

How about a little history lesson? Compliments of 24hourgold.com and my favorite silver bug David Morgan and dedicated to Mammoth and Mrs. Mammoth for buying silver. Queenbee.


Unless you are a real silver bug or a much studied gold bug, the concept of Silver Thursday will have little meaning for you. Silver Thursday took place on March 27, 1980, and this-coming Saturday marks the thirtieth anniversary of that event.  
 
Generally, the take on Silver Thursday is explained by Wikipedia as follows: 
 
The Hunt brothers had invested heavily in futures contracts through the brokerage firm Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, now Prudential-Bache Securities. When the price of silver dropped below their minimum margin requirement, they were issued a margin callfor $100 million. The Hunts were unable to meet the margin call, and facing a potential $1.7 billion loss, the ensuing panic was felt in the financial markets in general, as well as commodities and futures. Many Government officials feared that if the Hunts were unable to meet their debts, some large Wall Street brokerage firms and banks might collapse.[2]
To save the situation, a consortium of US banks provided a $1.1 billion line of credit to the brothers which allowed them to pay Bache which, in turn, survived the ordeal. TheU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) later launched an investigation into the Hunt brothers, who had failed to disclose that they in fact held a 6.5% stake in Bache.

This is the generally accepted version and basically correct, but the story is much more involved. Most of what will be penned below is from the book Silver Bulls, by Paul Sarnoff. Mr. Sarnoff’s account cannot be verified as to every detail, and my quick synopsis will hardly do this historic silver event justice. Those who are truly interested in the “long” version (pun intended) will have to find a copy of the book. 
 
If we go back a bit, we can find some interesting points leading up to this event. On January 7, 1980, the Comex board held a meeting and adopted “Silver Rule 7,” which specified any account with more than 100 contracts a reportable account. No individual could carry more than 2,000 contracts, or more than 500 for any one delivery month. “Bona fide” hedgers were, as usual, exempted from Silver Rule 7!  
 
As Paul Sarnoff expresses on pages 81 and 82 of Silver Bulls, there was clear evidence that some of the larger longs were apparently buying January and February up to the monthly position limit—thus creating the possibility of a squeeze on the shorts. After noting this, one of the board members suggested that both these months be limited to 50 contracts per account, and thus, on January 9, 1980, Silver Rule 7 was amended to reflect this change. 
 
According to Sarnoff, the Hunts and their corporate allies controlled about 192 million ounces of silver. 
 
The Hunts were aware of the rules being manipulated and there was a way out; it was to “simply switch their futures into physicals, hock the physicals abroad at interest rates, which were of course tax deductions, and shift their forward buying, if any, to the London Metal Exchange” (page 95).
 
As if enough wasn’t taking place, one of the main firms that the Hunts were doing business with needed some help to stave off a takeover bid and thus did Bache a favor by purchasing Bache stock. 
 
The Hunts had purchased a substantial position in Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, over 5%, and were therefore insiders. This prevented them from selling a substantial amount of this stock when the margin call was issued. In other words there was no way the Hunts could use their Bache stock to finance part of the call.  
 
When things started to unravel on March 27, Nelson Bunker Hunt was in Europe, announcing the idea of a silver-backed bond. The proposal was to issue a bond in various denominations and distribute it through large European banks to investors.  
 
As the news spread of the silver bond proposal, the Bache $100 million margin call, and the rumor that the Hunts might not be able to meet the margin call, a Comex member started selling silver, and panic hit the silver pits. The reaction was rapid—the Dow Jones Industrial Average began tumbling, and trading was halted in Bache stock.
 
Bache, Merrill Lynch, and the New York Stock Exchange sent a message to the CFTC, asking the Commission to halt trading in silver to quell the panic. This request was denied and silver dropped about $4.00 from the previous day to stop at $10.80. 
 
Paul Volcker was brought in and “arrangements” were made to solve the problems that were rippling through the financial markets. Later, the $1.1 billion “bailout” loan caused then Senator Proxmire to hold a hearing of the Senate Banking Committee, due to a great deal of resentment about the loan being issued. 
 
So for some time, the Hunts accumulated their frequent flyer miles between Dallas and D.C.  As Sarnoff notes, “It is ironical that the investigations focused only on the actions of the silver longs rather than the silver shorts. Only in Senator Proxmire’s hearings did inkling emerge of the role the shorts had played in the rise and fall of the silver price. At that hearing it became evident that the congestion in silver happened to be not just on the long side, but even more on the short side.” 
 
Finallyhe writes:
 
“Whether or not such frank journalism will lead federal agencies to investigate the accounts and the activities of the short-sellers in silver, who were members of the boards of directors of the involved silver exchanges, is a moot subject.”
 
So, it seems we “silver bulls” have seen the investigation into probably the most notable story about silver, played from the long side only. As we approach the upcoming hearing with the CFTC on March 25 to discuss position limits in gold and silver, we can keep hopes high, but let’s also keep them realistic. Even though there are two sides to every story, it seems the long version gets more attention from the big players.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

From God's mouth to our ears. Bill Gross says the bond rush is coming to an end. He may be right.
Queenbee





By Thomas R. Keene and Susanne Walker
March 25, 2010, 12:39 PM EDT

Bill Gross, manager of the world’s biggest bond fund at Pacific Investment Management Co., said the almost three-decade bond market rally may be drawing to a close.

Excess borrowing in nations including the U.S., U.K. and Japan will eventually lead to inflation as governments sell record amounts of debt to finance surging deficits, Gross said. Pimco, which announced in December that it would offer stock funds for the first time, is advising that investors buy the debt of counties such as Germany and Canada that have low deficits and higher-yielding corporate securities.

“Bonds have seen their best days,” Gross said in a Bloomberg Radio interview today from Pimco’s headquarters in Newport Beach, California. “We are focused more in spread space than in yield space. Durations should be shorter than index and you should be taking a little more risk in terms of spreads.”

Yields on two-year U.S. Treasury notes are likely to rise to 1.25 percent to 1.5 percent from 1.08 percent in the next year as the economy strengthens and the Federal Reserve begins to increase interest rates, Gross said.
“Real interest rates are moving higher,” said Gross, who co-founded Pimco in 1971. “That’s the main bear element in the bond market.”

Real yields, which take into account inflation or deflation, have increased to 1.71 percent on 10-year Treasuries from 1.12 percent at the end of last year.

‘New Normal’
The yield on the 10-year Treasury note reached a high of 15.8 percent in September 1981 and a record low of 2.03 percent in December 2008 during the height of the credit crunch. The notes yield 3.89 percent today.

Investors should avoid the debt of the U.K. and invest in shorter-maturity U.S. and Brazilian securities and longer- maturity German and “core” Europe bonds, Gross, 65, recommended in a commentary yesterday. Under what Pimco calls the “new normal,” Investors should expect lower-than-average historical returns with heightened government regulation, lower consumption, slower growth and a shrinking global role for the U.S. economy.

“Sovereign decoupling is symptomatic of the realization by the market that sovereign credits are vulnerable at some point down the road,” said Gross, who serves as co-chief investment officer with Mohamed El-Erian.

Gross increased holdings of bonds from non-U.S. developed nations in his Total Return Fund for a fourth month in February, taking them to the highest level since May 2004, according to data on the company’s Web site on March 17.

Total Return Fund
The fund manager raised the proportion of the securities to 19 percent of assets in February from 18 percent in January. Gross increased U.S. government-related debt to 35 percent from 31 percent, the first rise since October 2009, and lowered net cash to 2 percent from 9 percent.

The $214 billion Total Return Fund returned 16 percent in the past year, beating 54 percent of its peers, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. As of December, Pimco managed $1 trillion in assets. Pimco is a unit of Munich-based insurer Allianz SE.

The U.S. budget deficit reached a record $1.4 trillion for the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30 amid falling tax revenue from the recession, a bailout of the banking and auto industries, and the $787 billion economic stimulus package.

U.S. Treasuries have returned 0.9 percent this year, compared with 2.7 percent for German government bonds and 0.5 percent for U.K. gilts, according to indexes compiled by Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Equity Funds
All Group of Seven countries, except Canada and Germany, will have debt-to-GDP ratios close to or exceeding 100 percent by 2014, John Lipsky, first deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund, said in a speech March 21 at the China Development Forum in Beijing.

Pimco filed with U.S. regulators in December to start a stock mutual fund that can also invest in bank loans,
junk bonds and distressed securities. The Pimco Global Opportunities Fund will buy securities and financial instruments “economically tied” to at least three countries, one of which may be the U.S., according to a company filing.

Investors should “move outside of the United States,” in choosing stocks, Gross said. Emerging and developing countries because they are now “creditor countries” that feature strong growth while developed countries are the “debtor countries” and carry weaker growth, he said.

The “typical suspects” to invest in include Brazil, China and India, Gross said.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Robert R. Prechter, Jr. - Founder & President of the Elliot Wave Int’l. & Socionomics

Elliott Wave International Founder and CEO Robert Prechter appears regularly on Bloomberg television and has been featured on CNBC and media from around the world. Robert Prechter has written 13 books on finance, beginning with Elliott Wave Principle in 1978, which predicted a 1920s-style stock market boom. His 2002 title, Conquer the Crash, predicted the current crisis. Prechter’s latest interest is a new approach to social science, which he outlined in Socionomics—the Science of History and Social Prediction published in 2003. In this interview Bob discusses the U.S. Dollar, gold, the stock market, where are the bears, psychology as the market rallies, the economy, pension shortfalls, states being in trouble financially, U.S. default, how the default will unfold and much more.
http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/3/20_Robert_Prechter_files/Bob%20Prechter%203:20:2010.mp3

Renaissance 2.0: Lesson 1-3 - Revisiting American History - Financial Empire

About the author of these short videos:

I have had two fairly different lives—one as an addicted overachiever serving the financial empire, and another as a hopeful advocate for the victims of the empire: local community, indigenous population, the American republic, and the individual heart. I graduated from the United States Military Academy, served as an officer in the US Army, then went to Harvard Business School, took a short detour on Wall Street, and had a career in Silicon Valley. Since leaving empire service, I spent a lot of time trekking and mountaineering, attended Mars Hill Graduate School, and now work toward redemption as a writer and post-neoclassical economic philosopher (just a title to differentiate myself from economists, a profession so hopelessly stuck in abstruse mathematical models that it's become wildly disconnected from truth and life).

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l37RhdFGVsM

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGTBkNJ8ZWI

Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2VDC8UQ3c8



Also for those who are interested in what John Hathaway has to say go to King World News below. The interview is about 30 minutes long.
http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/3/20_John_Hathaway.html

http://www.tocqueville.com/index.html

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

All Invoke Keynes as Stimulus Advocates Assailed as Spendthrift

By Richard Tomlinson


March 23 (Bloomberg) -- The spending that politicians uncorked as the financial meltdown crippled the global economy in late 2008 and early 2009 followed a script written during the Great Depression by British economist John Maynard Keynes: Use government money to fill the void until consumer spending and business investment revive.

Now it’s the red ink created by this largest-ever application of Keynesian stimulus that’s polarizing political and economic debate, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its May issue. One camp argues that deficits and public debt have become the biggest threats to sustained economic growth. The other side says cutting spending too soon will destroy a still- fragile recovery.

“The fact that the world hasn’t slid into another Great Depression, which the collapse of the banking system in 2008 made possible, is because governments followed Keynes,” says Robert Skidelsky, author of a three-volume biography of Keynes and an advocate of keeping public money flowing until robust growth returns. “Governments bailed out financial institutions and allowed their budget deficits to grow -- neither of which happened between 1929 and 1931.”

Six decades after his death, Keynes’s ideas are being put to the test as never before. While the economist wrote his greatest works in the 1930s, he was largely unsuccessful in efforts to persuade U.S. and British leaders to boost government spending during the Depression. Keynes sent a copy of his 1933 treatise, “The Means to Prosperity,” to President Franklin D. Roosevelt and met him in Washington in 1934. Still, in the mid- 1930s, the U.S. cut spending -- and the Depression dragged on.

Keynesian Again
Keynes’s influence rose after World War II and ebbed starting in the 1970s, as economists led by Milton Friedman argued that long-term state-funded stimulus created unemployment and inflation.

Now, almost everyone has become a Keynesian again, at least temporarily. Governments have spent more than $2 trillion to spur growth since the credit crunch began, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Budget deficits will equal 5.6 percent of global gross domestic product this year, or about 10 times the level prior to the start of the crisis, the International Monetary Fund forecasts.

Reducing deficits is both a political and economic challenge. The Greek government has committed, even amid street protests, to cut spending and raise tax revenue to persuade skeptical investors that it’s safe to buy the country’s bonds. Portugal has passed a budget plan to reduce its deficit. The Irish government is negotiating pay cuts with public workers as it tries to limit its outlays.

Election Issue
In the U.K., where Prime Minister Gordon Brown must hold an election by June, the Treasury forecasts the deficit will almost double to about 170 billion pounds ($260 billion) for the fiscal year that ends this month. Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling said on March 21 on BBC television that he won’t offer pre-election “giveaways” that would widen the deficit when he presents the government’s budget this week.

Britain’s main opposition Conservative Party promises limited spending cuts in 2010 and bigger ones in 2011 if they win the election that must be held by June. “While private- sector debt was the cause of this crisis, public-sector debt is likely to be the cause of the next one,” George Osborne, the member of Parliament who speaks for the Conservatives on economic matters, said in a Feb. 24 speech.

Republican Rallying Point
The U.S. deficit -- forecast by the Obama administration to reach a record $1.6 trillion this year -- is a rallying point for Republicans. They are demanding lower spending and complaining that future generations will pay for today’s profligacy with higher taxes. While Keynes’s critics often complain that inflation comes with stimulus spending, prices have been steady so far in the U.S.

Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz says such talk is reminiscent of what politicians and bankers said in the 1930s. “Keynes would be amused by the fact that financiers, as in the 1930s, are saying that we have to focus on deficit reduction,” says Stiglitz, an economics professor at Columbia University.

While President Barack Obama says he too wants to tackle the deficit, he and his fellow Democrats don’t want to turn off the spending tap too soon. “We’re not going to make the mistakes that many other countries have made in the past, which is to, at the first signs of life and hope, step on the brakes,” U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said in a March 12 speech.

Obama has created a commission to come up with a plan for taming the budget. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker and former Republican Senator Alan Simpson of Wyoming are among the members.

AAA Rating
Moody’s Investors Service said in a March 15 report that the U.S. and U.K. have moved substantially closer to losing their Aaa rating. The two will spend more on debt service as a percentage of revenue than other countries that command the highest sovereign debt classification, the ratings company said. Neither is likely to lose the top rating anytime in the next three years, Moody’s said.

The next big battleground over Keynes’s theories may be in his native land. Stiglitz, Skidelsky and 65 other economists published a letter in the Financial Times on Feb. 19, warning that the U.K.’s weak growth would be threatened by overly hasty spending reductions.
They were responding to a letter that ran in the Sunday Times five days earlier from 20 academics, including Howard Davies, director of the London School of Economics and Political Science. This group demanded a credible plan to cut the deficit faster than Brown has promised.

Invoking Keynes
Even deficit hawks invoke Keynes in their arguments. “Keynes wouldn’t have been happy to see structural deficits persist for a very long time,” Davies says, referring to budget gaps that linger even when an economy is growing.

Jesper Fischer-Nielsen, a fixed-income analyst at Danske Bank A/S in Copenhagen, says Keynes’s prescription to revive growth is right. “You need a sustainable recovery in the big world economies, and then you get the chance to restore public finances,” he says. “I’m a Keynesian, and we should all be Keynesians once again.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Richard Tomlinson in London at rtomlinson1@bloomberg.net

Monday, March 22, 2010

Google Sidesteps Censorship in China via Hong Kong

By Brian Womack




March 22 (Bloomberg) -- Google Inc., following through on a promise to stop censoring search results in China, began redirecting traffic from its Chinese home page to the company’s unfiltered Hong Kong site, outside of mainland China.

Google will offer uncensored results in simplified Chinese, designed for users on the mainland, according to a blog post today. The move follows a two-month dispute between the company and the Chinese government over censorship.

“The Chinese government has been crystal clear throughout our discussions that self-censorship is a non-negotiable legal requirement,” Google said on the blog. “We believe this new approach of providing uncensored search in simplified Chinese from Google.com.hk is a sensible solution to the challenges we’ve faced -- it’s entirely legal and will meaningfully increase access to information for people in China.”

The question now is whether China will block access to the site from the mainland, said Aaron Kessler, an analyst at Kaufman Brothers LP in San Francisco. The Hong Kong site isn’t subject to the same censorship requirements as mainland sites. For example, it was displaying several results on the search term “Tiananmen Square massacre” today.

While part of China, Hong Kong has a separate government and economy -- a legacy of its role as a British territory until 1997. At the time of the handover, China promised to preserve Hong Kong’s capitalist system and free press for another 50 years.

Next Step

“It depends on what the Chinese government does -- if they allow Google to accept traffic from mainland China or if they shut that down,” Kessler said. “It wouldn’t be hard for people to type in Google.hk.”

The company challenged the government of the world’s most populous country in January by threatening to allow all search results to be shown on its Chinese-language Web site, including references to Tibet and the Tiananmen Square crackdown. Google has about 600 employees in China. The Chinese site, Google.cn, included the search engine, Google News and Google Images.

Google dropped $2.50 to $557.50 at 4 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. The shares have declined 10 percent this year.

‘Sophisticated’ Attacks

Google, the world’s top search engine, threatened to stop censoring content after reporting that its computers had been hacked from within China. The company said its systems were targeted by “highly sophisticated” attacks aimed at obtaining proprietary information, as well as personal data belonging to human-rights activists who use the company’s Gmail e-mail service.

At least 20 other international companies in technology, finance and chemicals were similarly targeted, Google said at the time.

“We also made clear that these attacks and the surveillance they uncovered -- combined with attempts over the last year to further limit free speech on the Web in China including the persistent blocking of Web sites such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google Docs and Blogger -- had led us to conclude that we could no longer continue censoring our results on google.cn,” Google said today on the blog.

--Editors: Nick Turner, Jeffrey Taylor

To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Womack in San Francisco at bwomack1@bloomberg.net

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Alcoa Gets Energy Chill From Australia’s $130 Billion Gas Boom



By Rebecca Keenan and Jason Scott
March 19 (Bloomberg) -- Australia is attracting more than $130 billion of investment in some of the world’s richest natural gas fields to supply buyers in Japan and China. Domestic customers, including Alcoa Inc., will have to wait.
Alcoa’s stalled alumina refinery expansion in Western Australia “will not be back on the agenda until we can secure long-term competitive gas supply,”Michaela Southby, a Perth- based spokeswoman for the biggest U.S. aluminum producer, said in an e-mailed response to questions. The project may cost $4 billion, according to a 2008 estimate by ABN Amro Holding NV.
Royal Dutch Shell Plc plans to deploy a production vessel larger than an aircraft carrier off the coast of Western Australia to feed the liquefied natural gas boom that may see annual exports hit almost A$40 billion ($37 billion) by mid- decade. The state’s gas shortage will last to at least 2020, hindering mine projects, according to the DomGas Alliance.
“You have all this energy and gas but most of it’s exported,” said Peter Arden, a Melbourne-based mining analyst at Ord Minnett Ltd., a JPMorgan Chase & Co. affiliate. “It’s going to be a really big cost input for the whole of Western Australia, especially the miners who rely on it for power.”
Alcoa, the biggest user of gas in Western Australia, gained 4.8 percent to close yesterday at $14.46 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The stock has dropped 10 percent this year. Alumina is used to make aluminum. LNG is gas chilled to liquid form for shipping.