Thursday, January 7, 2010

Black Swans Abound as Year of Tiger Shows Teeth: William Pesek


Commentary by William Pesek
Jan. 7 (Bloomberg) -- If many of us could have turned around the moment we entered 2010 and made obscene gestures at 2009, we would have.
After the wreckage of the past 12 months, 2010 has to be a good year, right? Good for governments staving off financial chaos, good for households struggling to stay afloat, good for investors wondering which rules of economics and markets still apply. It really is hard to see this year outdoing the last one in the doom-and-gloom department.
Yet the Year of the Tiger might live up to its name and be a fierce one. Here are five reasons why it may come with its share of sharp teeth and “Black Swans.”
1. The bill for 2009 is coming due. Look no further than Japan, which has little to show for the hundreds of billions of dollars it’s throwing at the economy. Deflation is intensifying, unemployment is worsening, the ranks of the working poor are growing and Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama is anything but focused on these fast-mounting challenges.
Now, he faces the hangover from the 2009 borrowing binge. His 2010 budget won’t rein in deficits that threaten Japan’s Aa2 rating at Moody’s Investors Service. The plot thickens when you add a shrinking population and tax base. That’s why the cost of a five-year contract to protect $10 million of Japan’s sovereign bonds has climbed to $68,650 from $37,000 in August, when Hatoyama’s Democratic Party of Japan won power.
Japan is hardly alone. Governments are pouring untold trillions of dollars into economies financed with fresh bond issuance. The debt glut is as unprecedented as it is unsustainable. Expect credit-rating companies and investors to be sniffing around for potential debt crises, be they in China, Greece, Japan or Vietnam.
2. Global demand remains elusive. Singapore, where gross domestic productshrank in the final three months of 2009 -- the first time in three quarters -- tells the story. It’s on the front lines of global trade and the annualized 6.8 percent drop in growth last quarter is an ominous sign.
China’s almost 10 percent growth is helping commodity exporters such as Australia. Not so for the rest of Asia as it tries to fill the void left by a hobbled $14 trillion U.S. economy. An undervalued currency greatly limits the spillover benefits of China’s stimulus efforts.
Skepticism is being voiced by leading economists on different ends of the ideological spectrum. Conservative Martin Feldstein, of Harvard University, and liberal Joseph Stiglitz, of Columbia University, say growth may falter as stimulus wanes. Just ask Singapore how U.S. frugality is working out for Asia.
3. Trade tensions will explode. Expect China’s peg to the dollar to become even more of an issue as unemployment rates rise from Washington to Berlin.
The recent breakdown of climate-change talks in Copenhagen dispels any optimism about multilateral cooperation. It’s beggar-thy-neighbor time as global growth limps along, and no one plays the game better than China.
On Jan. 1, a free-trade agreement between China and Southeast Asia came into force. It consolidated a sixfold surge in economic activity over the past decade between countries representing a quarter of the world’s population. Yet countries such as Indonesia are already concerned about lowering their guard against Asia’s rising superpower. Expect fireworks.
4. Central bankers will be on the ropes. They must find exit strategies for their monetary largess as asset bubbles inflate. Tap on the brakes too much and markets might crash. Apply them too timidly and inflation may accelerate.
India is one case of monetary policy being behind the curve. Officials from Seoul to Hanoi also face balancing acts.
Central-bank independence is a concern. It’s impossible politically to put rates back to reasonable levels anytime soon. They must try, though, and those efforts will make for a volatile year in Asian markets.
5. Black-Swan risks abound. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s attempt to blow up a plane over Detroit on Christmas Day is a reminder that terrorism can shake markets anytime. The assassination of a major world leader also would be an unexpected event with great impact.
Sovereign defaults can’t be ruled out, and troubles in small economies such as Iceland or Dubai have a way of spanning the globe. A huge dollar rally or yen plunge could upset so- called carry trades and bring down a couple of hedge funds. A crash in gold or oil prices would do the same.
Perhaps Japan will get its act together and recover for real. Or maybe things will go the other way: a debt crisis in Japan, the U.S. or the U.K.
Markets are hardly discounting hyperinflation, hyperdeflation, a global pension crisis, a collapse of North Korea’s repressive regime, social unrest in China or Iran, major earthquakes in Tokyo or California, or Somali pirates getting their hands on more than oil.
And, more basically, what if optimism that we dodged another Great Depression is hubris and markets tank anew? Treating the symptoms of the financial crisis isn’t the same as removing the causes.
We have seen how the impossible has a way of becoming possible these last two years. The one ahead may hold its own surprises as the Chinese zodiac’s tiger roars.
(William Pesek is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)
Click on “Send Comment” in the sidebar display to send a letter to the editor.
To contact the writer of this column: William Pesek in Tokyo atwpesek@bloomberg.net

11 comments:

Queenbee said...

No end in sight to possible bad tidings. I turned on CNN MSNBC and FOX and not a mention of Geithner. It seems that it has become the all terror all the time networks. No wonder I don't watch it. I was just hoping for some Geithner news. What was I thinking? All they wanted to talk about was a slow witted moron who had explosives in his underwear. It's as if Terrorism is the greatest plaque on the planet. How many die from heart disease, malaria, malnutrition vs terrorists? Come one give me Turbo Timmy's head on a platter. At least run him out on a rail.

DramaQueen said...

PK, this will be a good post when she has it posted on HOB!:
How to adjust a losing trade (coming soon)

Shaza said...

New Martin Armstrong piece:
http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/Behind-The-Curtain-The-Full-Monty-Part-One.pdf

Shaz said...

QB...If you want Geithner news, look at the email video I sent, it is a good interview!

DramaQueen said...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-darrell-issa/geithners-time-to-give-an_b_415476.html

Geithner's Time to Give Answers

P.K. said...

1) Well, we all know that last year sure wasn't the year of the Tiger, LOL!
2) Isn't it disgusting the way the corporate-owned MSM completely dismisses "the greatest swindle in history"? D. Issa will be ignored the same way that Greyson and R. Paul were.
3) I'm glad to see you all warming to those trading sites. There is WAY too much noise out there on the web, but there is so much good info out there, and we can all benefit from our individual trial-and-error screening processes. I would not have known about Skarica, for example, without you folks.
4) If you want info on China stocks, there's cnanalyst.com and chinavestor.com.

Shaza said...

PK, Skarica has a new podcast and charts out on Howestreet.com

Shaza said...

PK, also did you see Chanos is shorting China big time...
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/08/business/global/08chanos.html

He has said that for a while now...but who knows!

mugabe said...

I'm shorting China very small time. I still like the play, although have s small loss at the moment.
QB: I saw that Denninger post. Bear in mind he's been saying the same while the broad indices have climbed 10% more or less. I think Denninger is gtreat on macro, but potentially dangerous as an investment guide (athough I do happen to think there's more downside than upside potential at the moment).

Shaza said...

Did you guys see that Viet Nam is going to offer a bond issuance...that should attract a health rate! I would not be game though! Sorry, I forgot where I read it, maybe WSJ, s

Got A Watch said...

So, you're not long the dong?

I remembered where I had seen DavidDT from Trading to Win - he is a long time commenter from Bill Cara's Blog. Since he started guest posting at Evil once in a while his own site has really picked up, many of the traders from Evil and Slope of Hope are there now.

My eyes glaze over when I see too much discussion of trading the E-Mini futures. Since we know it is one of the most manipulated and artificial markets around, I am not sure why so many are still determined to trade it. Just recognize it's manipulated too much, does not behave like a normal market, and move on to something more realistic. Or do they really think they are good enough to consistently beat the Goldmen of the world in real time, when the G-men have a 1 second or more speed advantage, since they are trading from co-located servers a hundred yards from the Exchange, and they get to see your order flow at the same time as the market makers?

To each his own trading style, I guess.

Mugabe - KD has a technical analysis video he produces each night that is pretty good. He uses Think-or-Swim trading software in a flash .flv video, they range from 20-45 minutes each. He does not talk about these trades on his Blog, which is a macro-economic focused Blog. You have to pay to access the video, $100-$200/ year, you can pay what you want. I used to watch them, but I gave up as downloading the 80 MB+ every day was taking too long with my crappy connection. He uses technical analysis to point out potential trades, and covers how well his past calls made out. He's pretty agnostic with the trading, he has even recommended gold at times, though it is mostly about the E-mini futures, S&P 500 and major US stocks.

I agree reading too many gloomy macro Blogs can adversely affect your trading. It is a fine line to walk, you have to be at least somewhat aware of headline news and the macro economic situation, without letting it affect your decision making. Very difficult, in fact.

Our own biases tend to be self-reinforcing - we seek out others who tend to agree with us. Or in the case of Blogs, we mostly read those who have a point of view similar to our own - we are who we are.

You need two brains, one to read the macro economic gloom'n'doom, another to trade with.

Just be a bearish bull, and a bullish bear. Get a happy-face poster, and hang it above your monitor.